Henri Laaksonen vs Matt Reid Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W W L W L L
Form
W L W L L L W W L LHead-2-Head: Laaksonen 1 - 2 Reid
They have played 6 sets in total, with Laaksonen winning 2 and Reid winning 4. The last match between Laaksonen and Reid was at the Columbus Challenger, 23-09-2015, First, I.hard with Henri Laaksonen getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Henri Laaksonen | 1 |
| Matt Reid | 2 |
Columbus Challenger(23-09-2015)
6
2
6
4
| Laaksonen | Stats | Reid |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 827 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 84 | Highest Rank | 183 |
| 33 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 7 |
| 53% (448-392) | Career Total W/L | 54% (280-243) |
| $1,218,340 | Career Prize Money | $62,108 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Matt Reid
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 22 | Games Won | 30 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:21:12 | Average Match Time | 0:21:12 |
| 57% (24/42) | 1st Serve % | 53% (31/59) |
| 96% (23/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (21/31) |
| 72% (13/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (12/28) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (26/59) | Return Points Win % | 14% (6/42) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Henri Laaksonen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Henri Laaksonen
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Henri Laaksonen
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
83)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Alexey Vatutin
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
41%
(
29 of
70)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Henri Laaksonen
47%
(
35 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Karol Drzewiecki
57%
(
75 of
131)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
117)
5
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
43%
(
24 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
42%
(
55 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
46 of
117)
122
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(7) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Maciej Rajski
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
50
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matt Reid Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 5-7 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Goransson
Player
Matt Reid
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
13
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Matt Reid
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matt Reid
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
57%
(
70 of
122)
1st Serve %
63%
(
78 of
124)
14
Aces
12
10
Double Faults
3
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
38 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
40 of
124)
124
Total Points Won
122
|
6-7(0) 7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matt Reid
Player
Neil Pauffley
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
N.Sriram Balaji
Player
Matt Reid
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
7
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Matt Reid
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Barton
Player
Matt Reid
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
78 of
117)
20
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
53 of
78)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
28 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
41 of
117)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (448/392) | Win/Loss | 54% (280/243) |
| 51% (1030/978) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (639/568) |
| 50% (9709/9518) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5973/5749) |
| 52% (97/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (185/162) |
| 52% (202/183) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (70/52) |
| 58% (147/107) | Indoor Hard W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 15% (2/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 51% (24/23) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 3382 | Aces Total | 1750 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2308 | Total Double Faults | 1068 |
| 1:18:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 532.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 614.69 |
| 58% (29151/50214) | 1st Serve % | 57% (9504/16690) |
| 70% (20508/29151) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (6958/9504) |
| 49% (10394/21063) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3454/7186) |
| 41% (2001/4924) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (447/1212) |
| 39% (20156/51414) | Return Points Win % | 34% (5543/16281) |
| 48% (32/35) | Slam W/L | 32% (6/13) |
| 36% (8/14) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 50% (12/12) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (79/82) | Main Tour W/L | 26% (8/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (238/192) | Challenger W/L | 47% (104/117) |
| 58% (79/57) | Futures W/L | 65% (162/87) |
| 54% (431/795) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (274/514) |
| 46% (17/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 51% (147/288) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (100/186) |
| 62% (172/279) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (83/166) |
| 89% (390/346) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (291/240) |
| 11% (390/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (291/51) |
| 23% (450/102) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (232/40) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
